Some common sense advice
on hearing protection
Use this article to form the basis
of an in-house training class
Eric
A. Patton, Training Manager, Dalloz Safety, Reading, Pennsylvania
Noise-induced hearing loss is a disabling injury. Imagine going through
the rest of your life without the ability to communicate with others, enjoy
your favorite music, or simply appreciate the subtle sounds of nature.
OSHA estimates that as many as 15 million Americans have a measurable hearing
loss and that 30 million workers are exposed to potentially hazardous noise
levels on the job. Proper selection and use of personal hearing protection
devices significantly reduces the potential for noise-induced hearing damage.
OSHA regulations are designed to protect workers from noise exposure
hazards. The original OSHA regulation has been in effect since 1971 and
amended in 1981 to include additional requirements, including the establishment
of an effective hearing conservation program. This amended regulation,
29 CFR 1910.95, has been in effect since 1983.
To better understand how hearing can be damaged, we need to first understand
sound and noise. Sounds are variations in air pressure detected by the
human auditory system. Noise is simply unwanted sound. High levels of noise
damage hearing and impair the ability to hear sounds such as warning alarms
and verbal communications from coworkers. Wear hearing protectors in these
noisy environments to reduce the noise at the ear to an acceptable level
without needlessly impairing communication.
Two distinct characteristics describe sound or noise--amplitude and
frequency. Amplitude is the technical term for the volume of the sound,
that is, louder sounds have greater amplitude. Obviously, louder sounds
have greater potential for inducing hearing loss than quieter sounds. The
amplitude of a noise source is measured on a logarithmic scale with units
of decibels (dB) and is usually referred to as sound pressure level. This
scale is used because the human ear is responsive to such a wide range
of sound pressures that other units of measure are cumbersome and awkward
to use. The decibel scale, on the other hand, reduces this wide range to
an integer that ranges from about 0 to 140.
The A-weighted decibel scale, or dBA, is often used in industrial noise
applications because it more accurately reflects the damaging potential
of the noise. The dBA scale de-emphasizes lower frequency sounds since
they are less damaging than higher frequency sounds of thesame amplitude.
TWA refers to the Time Weighted Average over an eight hour workday.
OSHA considers time weighted average exposures of 90 dBA and over to be
hazardous (see Figure 1). Most experts agree that noise exposures should
be limited to 85 dBA whenever possible. Even brief exposure to extremely
loud impulsive noise such as gunfire can cause permanent noise-induced
hearing loss. A person's susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss varies.
In other words, two people working in the same noise exposure for the same
length of time may experience quite different degrees of hearing loss.
Hearing
protectors are only effective if they are worn for the entire duration
of the noise exposure.
Sounds are comprised of many separate components, each of which may
have a primary frequency. That is, most sounds are the combination of many
high, low, and middle frequency sounds. These frequency components are
measured in cycles-per-second, or Hertz (Hz). On a piano, the primary frequency
of the A note above middle C is 440 cycles per second, or 440 Hz. Cycles
per second correspond to variations of air pressure caused by the sound
source. Industrial noise sources typically range from about 60 to about
10,000 Hz.
The human auditory system is capable of hearing sounds from about 20
to about 16,000 Hz. It should be noted that most of the useful information
occurs below about 10,000 Hz. For example, speech information is in the
range of about 125 to 6,000 Hz. When noise-induced hearing loss occurs,
the loss usually becomes evident in the higher frequencies first, typically
around 4,000 Hz. From there, the loss spreads upward and downward in frequency.
Along with the reduced ability to hear sounds, there are other problems
associated with noise-induced hearing loss. To the hearing impaired, audible
information often sounds garbled or confusing. Ringing in the ears--tinnitus--may
accompany high-level noise exposure. Chronic tinnitus is particularly debilitating
for some people.
Hearing loss occurs when the eardrum and the small bones of the middle
ear relay high levels of sound energy to the inner ear. The primary structure
in the inner ear is the cochlea. This structure has thousands of tiny hair
cells that respond to vibrations in the inner ear fluids. The cochlea is
spiral shaped and the hair cells extend from the base (bottom) to the apex
(top) of the spiral. The hair cells respond to different frequencies depending
on their location. Hair cells at the base of the cochlea respond to high
frequency sounds and hair cells at the apex of the cochlea respond to lower
frequency sounds. The hair cells may be damaged by excessive noise exposure.
Long-term exposure to high levels of noise eventually kills some of these
hair cells, resulting in hearing loss in the corresponding frequency regions.
Other maladies associated with high level noise exposure include increased
levels of stress and anxiety, elevated blood pressure, increased susceptibility
to illness, sleep problems, headaches, and tinnitus.
While OSHA tries to protect workers by establishing a time weighted
action level of 85 dBA and a time weighted permissible exposure limit of
90 dBA, there are no such regulations that govern noise exposure during
time away from work. Noise exposure during leisure activities increases
the hazardous effect of ones workday exposures. Activities with power tools,
chain saws, or guns obviously have the potential to damage hearing. Other
potentially hazardous activities include auto racing and loud music. During
loud activities, it is easy and inexpensive to protect hearing with personal
hearing protection.
Hearing
protector ratings
Proper selection of hearing protection is important. The device must
be comfortable, fit correctly, and provide adequate protection from the
wearer's noise exposure. The EPA mandates that hearing protectors be labeled
with a Noise Reduction Rating. While this number is a general indicator
of the effectiveness of a protector, do not base your selection solely
upon the Noise Reduction Rating of the device.
The Noise Reduction Rating of a hearing protector is derived from testing
procedures outlined in the American National Standards Institute standard
S3.19 - 1974. These tests require a controlled laboratory setting and the
noise reduction measurements may be quite different than the actual noise
reduction provided in work environments. Many factors account for this
difference, including poor training and motivation of the hearing protection
device wearers, improper fitting, and physical characteristics of the hearing
protection device user that prevent a good fit. Hearing protectors are
only effective if they are worn for the entire duration of the noise exposure.
If the protector is removed for even brief periods during the noise exposure,
the effective protection drops dramatically, resulting in a potentially
hazardous noise exposure. For these reasons, selecting a comfortable and
properly fitted hearing protector is critical.
The right protector
Choosing the correct hearing protector can be confusing considering
the vast array of types, styles and sizes. Select hearing protectors that
provide sufficient protection while not unnecessarily degrading the ability
to communicate. The safety products supplier or hearing protection manufacturer
is a valuable asset during the selection process.
Most manufacturers have a well-trained, experienced technical service
department to assist you in the hearing protection device selection process.
These experts will base recommendations on your specific noise exposure
and other requirements. There are other sources of information available
to you as well, including your local OSHA Consultation Office, regional
OSHA office, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National
Hearing Conservation Association, and the American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Begin by choosing the type of protection suitable for your application.
This selection will be limited to an earmuff, a semi-aural protector, or
an insert-type device--an earplug. Hearing protection devices range in
price from just a few cents for disposable foam earplugs to several hundred
dollars for electronic earmuffs. Obviously, these products provide widely
ranging levels of function, comfort, ease of use, durability and protection.
Muff-type protectors
Earmuffs can be either active or passive devices. Active protectors
incorporate either electronic or mechanical components to limit or cancel
noise. Passive earmuffs simply attenuate or block out sound by acting as
a barrier. Muffs are considered by some to be the most comfortable selection
for general long-term application, although their use in hot or confined
areas should be avoided.
Muffs require periodic maintenance to perform properly. This maintenance
includes inspection and possibly replacement of ear cushions, cup insert
materials, and the batteries in electronic muffs. Monitor the strength
of the headband. Stretching the headband beyond normal limits on some models
compromises the overall effectiveness of the muff.
Communication capabilities are currently available in muff-type devices,
including compatibility with pagers and two-way radios. Some models include
microphones and built-in amplifiers that allow communication during periods
of relative quiet while reducing high noise levels, including hazardous
impulse noises such as stamping machines or gunfire.
Muffs with frequency-specific attenuation block out certain frequencies
while allowing transmission of others. These devices may be more suitable
in specific noise environments than traditional muffs and they may also
allow superior speech communication under some noise conditions. Advances
in earmuff technology include linear attenuation devices and active noise
cancellation products. Noise Reduction Ratings for muff-type devices range
from about 16 to 30 dB, and prices can run from less than $10 for economy,
general purpose muffs, to around $40 for frequency-specific passive muffs,
to as much as $400 or more for active noise cancellation devices (1998
prices).
Most models of muff-type protectors are available in both standard headband
configuration and as attachments to safety caps. In standard headband form,
some models may be worn with the headband in three positions, over-the-head,
under-the-chin and behind-the-head. When worn in the under-the-chin or
behind-the-head positions, it may be useful to use a crown strap to stabilize
the device. This strap connects to both cups and is worn over the top of
the head.
Stretching the headband beyond normal limits on
some models compromises the overall effectiveness of the muff.
Semi-aural protectors
Semi-aural protectors, also called canal caps, semi-inserts or banded
plugs, provide comfortable, economical protection from moderate level noise
exposures. These devices use earplugs or soft, pliable pods attached to
a flexible plastic or metal band. The band can be worn over the head, behind
the neck or under the chin.
Semi-aural hearing protectors are available in several styles, each
of which incorporates a headband that holds the protectors in place. The
protectors may be conventional earplugs, modified versions of conventional
plugs, or devices that block out noise by sealing off the entrance to the
ear canal. Because this protector usually is not inserted deep into the
ear canal, it reduces the discomfort created by the outward pressure of
an expanding plug. Semi-aurals are often preferred by individuals that
need intermittent protection, as the devices can be easily removed and
re-fit. When not in use, they are often worn around the neck. Another advantage
of this type of protector is that it is possible for individuals in dirty
environments to remove and re-fit the protector without touching the plugs
themselves. This reduces the possibility of introducing dirt into the ear
canal. Noise Reduction Ratings for semi-aurals range from about 16 to 26
with prices between $3 and $10.
Earplugs
Earplugs are available in many sizes, shapes, colors, and materials.
Reusable earplugs are usually made of silicone or polyvinylchloride materials
for durability. Disposable plugs are usually constructed of a polyvinylchloride
or urethane foam material. Multiple-sized plugs may be preferable for optimal
fit, comfort, and protection. It is more likely that a large population
of individuals will be properly fitted with a multiple-sized plug than
with a single-size device.
Most earplugs are available with or without cords. These cords are worn
around the neck, with the intention of preventing the wearer from accidentally
dropping or losing the plugs. Select metal-detectable plugs if the wearer
is involved in a sensitive process such as food processing or pulp manufacturing.
The best choice in this situation is a protector that is completely detectable.
Should the protector be cut or chopped into smaller pieces, all the pieces
remain detectable by metal scanners. Prices for detectable plugs range
from $1 to $3 per pair with Noise Reduction Ratings from 15 to 33.
Disposable earplugs constitute the bulk of the hearing protectors in
use today, in part due to the low price (about 10 to 20 cents per pair).
When the total cost of using one or more pairs of disposable earplugs per
day is considered, disposable plugs may be more expensive than reusables.
Disposable earplugs usually are not considered to be the most comfortable
hearing protector, especially foam-type plugs that require rolling and
deep insertion for maximum protection. The expansion of the foam produces
outward pressure in the canal, leading to discomfort for some wearers.
The transfer of dirt from the users' fingers to the earplug during rolling
and subsequent insertion into the ear canal also leads to the possibility
of irritation or infection. Non-foam earplugs exert less outward pressure
on the canal and are less likely to carry dirt into the canal during fitting.
Disposable earplugs are typically labeled with very high Noise Reduction
Ratings. While this rating may appear desirable, using hearing protection
devices with ultra-high noise reduction is not required in most job settings.
Using high NRR products in environments where they are not required may
result in overprotection that unnecessarily reduces the ability to hear
warning signals or verbal communications.
Muffs with frequency-specific attenuation block
out certain frequencies while allowing transmission of others.
Hearing
protection device selection
As a starting point, the Noise Reduction Rating may be used for hearing
protection device selection. It should be noted, however, that the Noise
Reduction Rating may be inaccurate by plus or minus 10 dB or more, depending
on the frequency characteristics of the noise exposure. The Noise Reduction
Rating is calculated assuming equal exposure across the frequency range,
and therefore the Noise Reduction Rating may be inaccurate if the noise
exposure is dominated by high or low frequencies. A rule of thumb for selecting
hearing protection devices using the Noise Reduction Rating is to select
a device with a Noise Reduction Rating equal to the dBA level of the exposure
minus 70 dB. Using this procedure, the wearer should be fitted with a device
that reduces the level of the exposure at the ear to between 75 and 80
dBA. This range has been determined to be optimal for speech communications
in noisy environments. For example a noise level of 94 dBA suggests selecting
a hearing protection device with a Noise Reduction Rating of 94 dBA - 70
dB or 24 dB.
Remember that these calculations are only valid when the protector is
used properly and in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. In
addition, the hearing protection device must be worn during the entire
duration of the noise exposure. If the wearer removes the protector during
the noise exposure, the effective level of protection is reduced drastically.
For instance, if a protector with a Noise Reduction Rating of 30 is removed
for a total of just 30 minutes during an eight-hour workday, the effective
protection is reduced to less than 50 percent of the Noise Reduction Rating
(see Figure 3).
Multiple-sized plugs may be preferable for optimal
fit, comfort, and protection.
Hearing protector wearing time is directly related to comfort and communication
in high noise environments.
Employees fitted with hearing protection devices that are comfortable
and that allow optimal communication are more likely to wear their devices
consistently. Effective training in proper hearing protection device use
is also extremely important for effective overall hearing protection device
usage. OSHA requires the employer to provide training initially upon issue
of the hearing protector and annually thereafter. In order for the protector
to provide the labeled protection, the wearer must be instructed in the
correct fitting procedures. These training sessions are especially important
for the earplug wearer since more skill is required for proper insertion.
In summary, effective hearing protector use requires the proper training
and selection of comfortable devices that allow 100 percent wearing time.
In other words, The best hearing protector is the one that gets worn.
Copyright June 1998 Plant Services on the WEB
|